HR & legal ops
AI on employee files without exposing a single personal data point.
Pseudonymisation of identities, compensation, health data and contact details before AI ; local restoration ; nothing retained.
14 days on the Solo plan (1 seat), no credit card.
Cancel anytime, and since nothing is stored, you leave no data behind.
Banning doesn't work. IT blocked public AI tools : your HR teams use them to draft reviews, procedures and disciplinary letters.
The 3-step flow
Contracts, annual reviews, disciplinary files : names, salaries, health data and contact details neutralised.
Draft, summarise or translate in ChatGPT, Claude or Copilot : the AI only receives tokens.
Reinject data into the final document locally. Operation logs for DPO audit.
Three freedoms
Tool freedom
Any AI: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Copilot. No lock-in, no quota. Your subscription stays yours : always the best model of the moment.
Usage freedom
No workflow change, no training. Protection adds on; your teams change nothing. That's why people adopt it instead of bypassing it.
Vendor freedom
Zero storage. Nothing stays with us: nothing to audit elsewhere, nothing to recover if you leave, no dependency.
GDPR compliance and HR sensitivity
Maximum GDPR sensitivity segment : art. 4(5) pseudonymisation as art. 32 security measure, auditable processing, zero document storage.
HR data must never go in plain text to a third-party model : Safe-Doc neutralises data before sending ; what leaves contains no identifiable personal information.
Objection: "HR data is too sensitive for external AI."
Exactly why it must never go in plain text. Safe-Doc neutralises data before AI ; what leaves contains no identifiable personal information.